Why doesn spielberg do commentary

She also wrote about independent, foreign and studio movies and occasionally TV and theater stories. Born in East Orange, N. She worked for 10 years at the L. Herald Examiner and came to work at The Times in January She left in All Sections. About Us. B2B Publishing. Business Visionaries. So far, he has relied on tweaking genre conventions or pre-existing properties, rather than developing original material. His company, Bad Robot, has held on to a few just in case.

Whatever his achievements on the TV front, Abrams still has plenty of milestones to meet to match Spielberg — in terms of the breadth of subject matter, deftness of storytelling, depth of emotion conjured by his filmmaking and the sheer heft of his presence. Just as Spielberg admired and drew lessons from his progenitors but then cut his own path, so too Abrams must continue to break new ground.

Simply put, J. Abrams is the first J. Sign up for THR news straight to your inbox every day. However, as with most films based on historical events and figures, Spielberg takes certain liberties in his role as a director to adjust with the accuracy of that history. These adjustments lead to a series of questions worth pondering. Even though a director like Spielberg or script-writer like Tony Kushner, the script-writer for Lincoln, has the ability to make these changes, is it necessary?

Will changing certain facts of a film make that film more entertaining for the audience, even though some of its authenticity gets lost in transition? A bigger question would be if these changes will distort the audiences comprehension of the history. As a result, these changes tell a different story for its viewers. Several inaccuracies in Lincoln include the representatives of Connecticut and their role in the final vote, the exaggerated role of Lincoln's wife Mary Todd Lincoln, the use of the Gettysburg Address early in the film, and Lincoln's true intentions as president in passing the Thirteenth Amendment.

One major difference between the film and the history concerns the voting of the amendment. If passed, the Thirteenth Amendment would call for an immediate end to slavery throughout the entire country. In the film, as the representatives cased their votes of yea or nay, two of the four representatives from the state of Connecticut voted against the amendment. As a resu But it is also important to take into account the possible side-effects of these seemingly minor changes.

Sometimes the smallest change can lead to the public viewing a person in a profoundly different way, like today's perception of Lincoln as a courageous pioneer rather than a president simply fulfilling his oath to serve, protect, and preserve the status of the Untied States as Commander in Chief. Despite these changes, Spielberg did not disappoint with this film.

Lincoln, in spite of its flaws, effectively accomplished what it set out to do, which was to entertain the audience and highlight the importance slavery played in America's history and the historical impact of the Thirteenth Amendment on a country of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Get Access. Good Essays. Read More. Satisfactory Essays. The Important Message in Romero. Better Essays. Dangers of Avoiding the Politica Words 5 Pages. Dangers of Avoiding the Politica.